Machiavelli divide and conquer quotes1/14/2024 They were deeply suspicious of his loyalties, dismissed him from his posts, then had him imprisoned and tortured under suspicion of plotting against them. Just a year before he finished the first draft of his “little book”, the Medici swept into Florence in a foreign-backed coup after spending years in exile. But as a leading civil servant in charge of foreign affairs and defence, Machiavelli had been one of the republic’s stoutest defenders. The usual story is that he wrote The Prince as a job application, when he was seeking work as an adviser to Florence’s first family, the super-wealthy Medici. These doubts grew as I delved into his life and times, trying to understand what made him say what he did. I began to doubt that Machiavelli believed his own advice. For every cynical Machiavellian precept, I found two or three others that clashed with it. But he also says – in a passage most scholars pass over – that “victories are never secure without some respect, especially for justice”. At one moment he seems to applaud men who break their oaths at will, caring little for just dealings. I started noticing that Machiavelli’s writings speak in different voices at different times. Yet the more I read, the more I questioned this story. But his reasons were patriotic, well-meaning, human. Yes, he made sinister excuses for violence and hypocrisy. Academic summaries told me that Machiavelli was devoted to the salvation of his native city, Florence, and his country, Italy, at a time when both were ravaged by wars. Picking up The Prince or Discourses, I’d highlight all the attention-grabbing Machiavellian phrases and skim the rest. Like thousands of overworked lecturers, I had my shortcuts. It was part of my job to teach Plato-to-Nato courses in the history of ideas, and Machiavelli came up early in the year, squeezed between Augustine and Hobbes. Photograph: E4 Picture Publicityīut what if we’re overlooking Machiavelli’s less obvious messages, his deeper insights into politics? Until about a decade ago, it never occurred to me to ask this question. Machiavellian scoundrel … James Gandolfini as Tony Soprano in the HBO TV series The Sopranos. So it no longer shocks us to think that a highly intelligent man who lived five centuries ago, in times we imagine were far crueller than ours, spent night after night at his desk in the Tuscan countryside, his wife and children sleeping nearby, drafting the rulebook for today’s cynical populists and authoritarians. In watching their manoeuvres on screen we, like their victims, can’t help being a little seduced by their warped ingenuity. These Machiavellians are scoundrels, but subtle ones. Along with our daily news, popular culture has brought legions of Machiavellian figures into our homes and made them both human and entertaining: Tony Soprano, Frank and Claire Underwood in House of Cards, Lord Petyr Baelish from Game of Thrones. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the adjective has come to mean “cunning, scheming, and unscrupulous, especially in politics”. Most people today assume that Machiavelli didn’t just describe their methods, he recommended them – that he himself is the original Machiavellian, the first honest teacher of dishonest politics. But why did Machiavelli write a whole book about them, peppering it with men who soared to power by greasing palms and exploiting weaknesses: Julius Caesar, Pope Alexander VI, Cesare Borgia? Minus television and Twitter, it seems the techniques of ambitious “new princes”, as he calls them, haven’t changed a bit. The book is The Prince, its author Niccolò Machiavelli.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |